

Strauss Brands announced plans in September to relocate a meat processing facility from Franklin to the Century City Business Park near North 30th Street and West Capitol Drive. (Photo by Adam Carr)
Strauss Brands announced plans in September to relocate a meat processing facility from its Franklin location to the Century City Business Park. Located in the 30th Street Industrial Corridor, the facility near North 30th Street and West Capitol Drive, would have brought hundreds of jobs to a once-thriving business corridor.
The proposal, however, was met with pushback from animal rights protesters and ultimately from Common Council members.
Last week, Strauss Brands announced it would no longer be moving the slaughterhouse to Century City.
We asked community leaders and residents to weigh in on the controversy.
How do you feel about Strauss Brands ultimately not bringing a slaughterhouse to the 30th Street Corridor?
“Amani was the last to hear about the deal,” he said. “We were kind of left in the dark.”
“I feel two ways: It’s prime real estate and opportunity for some, but I also don’t think this is the appropriate area,” RiceBey said. “It’s an inhumane development for an environment that is already inhumane.”
What response have you seen from the community?
RiceBey said many residents are frustrated by the lack of information from the company, the city and the district’s alderman.
“To be honest, I think they knew they would have seen this type of opposition from the community,” he said.
What do you think could have been done differently through the process?
RiceBey said the company itself should have done more homework and reached out to the residents before talking to officials.
“When you bring this type of development to a neighborhood, talk to who the decision is going to impact first,” he said. “Let the people know, or it looks like a shady deal.”
Moving forward, residents and leaders should continue to be more civically engaged, RiceBey said. “I’m not even gonna get mad at the city,” he said. “Everyone just needs to be more of a concerned citizen.”
He said attending neighborhood meetings and engaging in the organization’s revitalization plan “for the residents, by the residents” is one way to become more informed. “The only thing we have to gain is a better neighborhood.”
She said the space has been vacant for a couple of decades, and many businesses in the area ultimately supported bringing in the meat processing facility. “We were encouraged by the fact that the company wanted to come into the area,” she said.
How do you feel about Strauss Brads ultimately not bringing a slaughterhouse to the 30th Street Corridor?
“My concern was that everything happened so fast and people didn’t get the facts,” she said.
Blue said the quickest-spreading information in opposition to the Strauss Brands plan— that the slaughterhouse would bring an increase in stench, rodents, crime and drugs in the surrounding neighborhoods— is inaccurate. She said much of the misinformation sparked from a protester-led Facebook group, and that Strauss Brands had plans to address those issues.
What do you think could have been done differently through the process?
“I’m not here to blame, but I think it is a teachable moment,” Blue said. She said for future business endeavors in area, community engagement and presentation of facts should be the priority.
The 30th Street Industrial Corridor’s work puts community engagement in Century City at its forefront. “We’ve been working in the area for years now and we are committed to the success of the area, which includes the people and the residents,” Blue said.
“It is in everyone’s best interest for this area of the city to be prosperous in Milwaukee and in the world,” she said.
How do you feel about Strauss Brads ultimately not bringing a slaughterhouse to the 30th Street Corridor?
“I think there should have been more outreach by Department of City Development to allow for the company to communicate to the broader community what their proposal was,” Hamilton said. “That should have happened at the very beginning of this process.”
He said too much effort was put on masking what the actual operations were, and there was not enough communication to residents.
What response have you seen from the community?
“There were a number of people who wanted to see progress at that site and the opportunity to have living family wages,” Hamilton said. “But there were also concerns regarding the impact of bringing a facility like that to the neighborhood.”
What do you think could have been done differently through the process?
“It seems as if all the media coverage has been kind of focused on who to blame as opposed to getting the appropriate information,” he said.
Going forward, he said, he is willing to work with the aldermen and community groups to provide a space for more in-depthdiscussion.
“All decisions about this location will be made with the facts,” he said.
How do you feel about Strauss Brands ultimately not bringing a slaughterhouse to the 30th Street Corridor?
“I’m disappointed,” Kendrix said. “When I think about 125 city residents that find a way to travel to Franklin for work, every day, I can only imagine how much better life would be for them and more city residents that wouldn’t have to travel as far.”
What do you think could have been done differently through this process?
“I can’t help but question if due process was really a part of the experience for Strauss,” he said. “Strauss should’ve had an opportunity to face questions relative to their operation and impact on the community.”
Kendrix also thinks it would have been impactful for the business to hear from city residents that work now for Strauss and city residents that reside within proximity to Century City.
How do you feel about Strauss Brands ultimately not bringing a slaughterhouse to the 30th Street Corridor?
“After talking with some residents, I am very happy that they did not bring that here,” Rogers said. “The residents opposed to the deal knew the possible cost to the environment and the stress that it would be on families living near a slaughterhouse.”
What response have you seen from the community you’re connected to?
The proposed wages of $14 to $15 an hour “would not be sufficient for the kind of disruption (residents) would have from this type of company,” she said
Community members are frustrated with the misinformation and lack of communication, she said, especially regarding the number of jobs the facility would bring. Rogers originally heard about 50 jobs would come to the community with the slaughterhouse addition, which differs than the officially announced 250 jobs.
What do you think could have been done differently through the process?
Rogers said elected officials and the company could have been much more transparent.
“If Strauss had bothered to come to the different neighborhoods and explained their process, if the alderman and mayor had come to the residents and been honest about the amount of jobs, it would be different,” she said.
What do YOU think?
What’s your take on the issue? Please email info@milwaukeenns.org and put “Century City” in the subject line or share your comments on Facebook.
Thank you for the article on “A Teachable Moment.” The insights of the residents who were interviewed (and the community as a whole) is a kind of case study from which we all can learn. Most important it seems is the missed opportunity to have meaningful discussions among Strauss, city officials and the residents. Most of the time when neighbors are given the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the process, more than resolving the particular subject at hand occurs. We get to know one another and begin building connections that can overlap with issues of family, education, health care, employment and the environment. Existing neighborhood groups are strengthened and signs of hope emerge for the whole community. Invite, gather, discuss and grow. It can be done.
This is an absolute debacle the fact that a 60 million dollar manufacturing plant something that would have provided jobs for generations won’t happen is a shame . Pure and simple there is blame enough to go around. Start with the fact the alderman didn’t share this idea with the people who live in the immediate area not to mention those who elected him. The fact he didn’t vet the plan showed his lack of experience and or political acumen or shear arrogance. Many claimed alderman Rainey was in support of this project until an organized group who didn’t speak for the entire community applied pressure on the alderman to acquiesce to the group in a 24 hour turn around. Make no mistake what took place was a travesty, and stinks to high heaven. The truth should be brought forth so never again will people use what is in the best interest of the people. I have lived in this city for 65yrs and seen some shameful conduct on the part of officials,this is right up there with the worst. And for those who used there platform to bring pressure for political gain shame on them,I will never use my platform to mislead the people in order for someone I’m supporting to receive a political advantage.
This is typical of the leadership in the City of Milwaukee, putting the people last.